Preface
The world is in turmoil all around us. For the past two decades, nation-states have been on the move, realigning their political orientations, associations, and systems of values and beliefs.
At an increasingly fast pace, old countries and empires are collapsing, and new societies and nations are born. Unfortunately, war, ethnic and religious cleansing, torture, social and political
injustice, unfair or oppressive commercial competition and irresponsible financial behavior on a global scale have also become part of this process of radical change.
Perhaps at no other time in human history have local and global leaders been more challenged than now to find the right path to a sustainable future for humankind. The lack of clean and
affordable energy, the diminishing supply of clean water, the imminent global collapse of the food supply to a vastly expanding human population, the fast growth of pollution due to the
increasing industrialization of large nations, climate change issues, ever-sharpening conflicts due to the unequal access of many communities to natural resources and affordable technological
solutions, and the impasse of philosophical and ideological differences, all of these are factors that decision-makers are called on to accept as reality and, therefore, find solutions
to.
To compound the problem, the effectiveness and speed of contemporary communication technologies and public media allow local and global leaders little time to catch their breath and carefully
consider their actions. Momentous decisions must be made almost instantaneously, in real-time, often with unforeseen, devastating consequences for humanity. This escalation in speed and volume
of flawed political, economic, and environmental decision-making has produced an avalanche of global instability and uncontrolled change, which has led, in turn, to more turmoil and confusion
at all levels.
And yet, this global crisis can also be seen as a unique opportunity for further human development. Because several important shifts are now occurring simultaneously, they are creating a
perfect time storm, so that current and future human actions can be radically transformed. In the last three decades alone, we have made tremendous progress in devising new, environmentally
responsible technologies and novel methods of applying traditional ones. Biology, physics, chemistry and medicine lead this progress, side by side with information and communication
technologies.We have all the tools at our fingertips to transform this planet into a sustainable global community.
We need to act now, however, and must be willing to develop and use these new tools not only in an intelligent, but also in a wise manner.We can no longer get by with partial patchworks of
fixes and need to begin thinking in terms of interrelated and integrated scientific and technological strategies to repair the negative, unintended consequences of the modern age of
industrialization and globalization. Above all, we need to embrace science and technology as tools for our higher, ethical development, instead of abusing them for destructive, competitive, and
selfish or greedy purposes. In other words, we need also to be willing to undergo a spiritual transformation, a radical change in our present mentality.
We need not only to become educated about the consequences of our decisions, but also begin to understand the complicated interrelations and hidden dependencies of global reality. This
complex, fast-moving reality requires a fully committed approach and willingness to investigate and understand the issues at hand, across all ideologies, philosophies, societies, and nations.
Thus, the world in all its facets must become intercultural and transdisciplinary. This is as true for economical and political realities, as it is true for science, technology and
education. Studies of problems, decisions, and implementations of policy need to be carried out through an integrated and transformative global partnership, based on full global
awareness.
In short, we need to refocus and look at our planet as a multilevel, integrated system. Our global community needs to start functioning as a harmonious whole, much like a very complex
super-organism, perpetually in a learning mode and flexible enough to make the vital adjustments and changes necessary for its continued wellbeing. Two previous books, Global Intelligence
andHuman Development (Spariosu 2005) and Remapping Knowledge (Spariosu 2006), have laid out the foundational principles and collective actions needed to set us on the road to building an
intelligent planet. The present book, which can best be read in conjunction with the other two, continues to describe the kind of conceptual and technological tools needed to further human
development toward global intelligence. We define global intelligence as the ability to understand, respond to, and work toward what is in the best interest of and will benefit all human beings
and all other life on our planet. This kind of responsive understanding and action can only emerge from continuing intercultural research, dialogue, negotiation, and mutual cooperation; in
other words, it is interactive, and no single national or supranational instance or authority can predetermine its outcome. Thus, global intelligence, or intercultural responsive understanding
and action, is what contemporary nonlinear science calls an emergent phenomenon, involving lifelong learning processes.
The Quantum Relations Principle is precisely such an integrated conceptual and technological tool, designed to move us, humans, one step farther not only toward global intelligence, but also
toward planetary wisdom. In Part One of the book, we lay out the scientific and philosophical foundations of the Quantum Relations Principle (QR for short). QR creatively combines the insights
of the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics, general systems theory, and contemporary cognitive and social science, in order to bring together, in transdisciplinary fashion, the study of
physical phenomena with that of mental and social phenomena. In computer science, QR is a revolutionary, theoretical and practical measuring tool that allows us to take into account,
simultaneously, the experiences of multiple observers (humans and/or machines) of the same event or series of events. It helps us build dynamic models of reality that can measure the
interactions of mutual causality among various observers and can make reasonably accurate assumptions about how they may behave and affect each other in the future.
In the first two chapters of Part One, we outline the scientific foundations of QR in relation to quantum physics and the theory of relativity. From quantum mechanics we borrow the idea of
quanta (the smallest units or “elementary particles” of observed reality that cannot be further reduced within the theory), as well as the principle of uncertainty, extending them to the human
mind and social phenomena. From Einstein’s theory of relativity, we borrow the idea that objects carry their own frame of reference with them, and that their interactions (making a measurement,
for example) are determined by the rules that govern those frames of reference. Thus, QR theory provides a description of the elements, structures, and interactions between objects as they
evolve over time. The crucial difference fromquantum physics and relativity theory, however, is that in Quantum Relations objects need not be physical. They can also be concepts, relationships,
or sets of mental, emotional, and social objects. QR attempts to derive, for each such set, the rules that govern the interactions of the objects in
the set, as well as the interactions of different sets.
In Chapter 3 we describe the basic principles of computation and the main computational features of Quantum Relations. QR revolves around two fundamental concepts that can equally be
translated into the mathematical language of quantum mechanics and constitute the cornerstones of any technology platform based on the QR principle. These concepts are “data fusion objects”
(DFOs) and “frames of reference” (FORs). Data fusion objects or DFOs can be defined as mental quanta or elementary particles. They interact according to well-defined rules, and the result of
their interaction can equally become a computed function. DFOs arise withinmultiple FORs. Each FOR can be represented as a metric space, i. e., as a set of DFO elements, with one or more
functions. Furthermore, a FOR can also be a DFO and vice versa, depending on their respective positions in the hierarchic space structure. Thus, a DFO can be an elementary particle in a
higher-level FOR. In turn, this FOR can be a DFO of another, higher-level FOR structure, and so forth.
The DFO/FOR model has many technical advantages, including self-adaptability : it will automatically search for the best method and the shortest path to accomplish its goal. Even more
importantly, the DFO/FOR model is capable of self-organization, because data and functions are implemented as sets of hierarchical objects. A FOR containing many DFO structures can also contain
rules for the creation of new DFOs, the interaction between its DFOs, and the calculation of functions between smaller DFOs, including the creation of new objects that embody certain
relationships between these smaller DFOs. Thus, DFOs and FORs provide a natural model for general parallel computation. Since DFOs and FORs are discrete objects, they can be implemented on
multiple processor systems, and calculations can be performed in parallel.
Furthermore, the DFO/FOR model is both modular and extensible. This means that a set of computations on one data set can be transformed into another data set and used by the second data set
to define a third set of new functions, translating the preceding FOR into the new one. In addition, a FOR can contain rules for logical inference and deduction that operate on its component
DFO objects. The fact that FORs are also considered DFOs for higherlevel frames allows lower-level frames to define data properties. DFOs could equally be used to pose queries on other DFO
frames. It can thus translate and incorporate any software program or computer language into its database, thus solving the currently intractable problem of systemic compatibility and
interchangeability in computer programming.
In addition, the DFO/FOR model is compact and adaptable, expressly designed to handle extremely large quantities of data, on the scale of gigabyte and terabyte sets, and to provide methods
for manipulating them through parallel processing systems. The model can handle data storage, recuperation, and processing with great flexibility and practically no data loss. It assumes that
no piece of information or knowledge from its database can ever become obsolete, because it may always turn out to be relevant in a different DFO/FOR configuration
or correlation between data sets.
Finally, in the last chapter of Part One, we place the Quantum Relations Principle in a larger philosophical context and point out its global ethical implications. QR shares the theoretical
advantages of general systems theory and its offshoots, the theories of complexity and self-organization, over their scientific, reductionist counterparts, especiallywithin a global reference
frame. The DFO/FOR model is based on the “web of life” (Capra 1997) in its most diverse and complex aspects, including human relations and interactions. Unlike most reductionist scientific
theories, QR implicitly acknowledges diversity and alterity as the very conditions of existence. It can take into account and process widely different cognitive perspectives, including
linguistic, philosophical, cultural, sexual, and other observer-dependent variables.
Like other contemporary strands of systems theory, QR acknowledges that hierarchies as modes of organization are best understood not as “centers of command and control,” but as reference
frames or levels of complexity embedded or nestled within each other and engaged in constant communication and mutual interaction. QR thus supports and enhances a cooperative, symbiotic view of
our universe, in which all living and nonliving components of the global system and subsystems depend on each other for their well-being and in which each perspective needs to be acknowledged
and respected as potentially valuable for the common good.
Another theoretical advantage of QR within a global reference frame is that it shares the nonlinear views of the ancient tradition of wisdom, or the philosophia perennis as Leibnitz called
it. We briefly examine such concepts as mutual causality or dependent origination, amplifying feedback loops, resonance, and the web of life as they first appeared in early Buddhism and Daoism
and are now shared by the contemporary philosophy of process and general systems theory. Thus, these concepts constitute an excellent philosophical and scientific meeting point not only ofWest
and East, but also ofNorth and South, because they can be found, in one form or another, virtually in all known civilizations on our planet. They have gained great relevance in our age, because
the planetary framework of globalization implies different rules and principles of human interaction, which need equally to be remapped and reorganized at the local and regional levels.
Furthermore, human evolution itself has revealed the wisdom of the old sages who advised the rulers of their time to move from a warlike mentality and violent competition to mindful, peaceful
and innovative coexistence with one another and with all other beings on our planet. The QR principle is in full consonance with this mentality of peace, which also implies a second-order
ethical system. Unlike first-order ethics, in which one accords preferential treatment to one’s own group, be it family, tribe, nation, religion, etc., the second-order ethics is based on the
Golden Rule (treat all human and other beings as you would like to be treated yourself) and is, therefore, the most appropriatemode of thought and behavior to adopt within a planetary reference
frame.
In Part Two of the book, we propose concrete, QR technology-supported, global solutions, in line with the QR principle and the ethical precepts of the philosophia perennis, in four essential
fields: big-data mining and processing, commerce, healthcare, and global learning and research. In Chapter 5, we describe one of our most exciting QR applications, an interactive content search
and delivery engine, which we have called Q-Search and which renders obsolete the current Google and Yahoo/Microsoft search and transaction technologies. Indeed, it can revolutionize the whole
field of intelligent, interactive management of information and content in real-time.
Q-Search is a problem-solving technological platform that operates broadly in three domains relevant to search issues. It excels at: 1) real-time content acquisition; 2) sophisticated
real-time data processing with an emphasis on linguistic content analysis; and 3) on-demand query, computation, and delivery. In addition, Q-Search offers advanced monitoring and management
tools to keep data centers aware of and provide flexibility in information, product and content offerings.
The most significant innovation of Q-search, however, is that it moves far beyond text and numbers. Unlike current search engines, which are text-based and still mostly static, Q-search can,
for example, store and retrieve a moving image, a sound file, or a sequential recording of behavior, as a computable object through its QR time-series representation (that is, representing data
as a sequence of objects over some time base). The ability of storing and retrieving such data as computable objects, rather than as fixed images or character strings, completely transforms the
browsing experience.
The “browser” of the future will be a virtual world in which the user searches, finds, manipulates, and transforms objects, and not a simple text-based, data retrieval system. Q-Search
technology can easily build the platform for this virtual world of content search, delivery and consumption models. Even more importantly, Q-Search can remember, preserve and dynamically track
and record user-based frames of reference in order to reproduce the “world of the user” inside computers and databases, including the user’s unique behaviors and interactions with his or her
environment. By continuously estimating the users’ future behavior and comparing it against their actual interactions, the QR-based search system becomes highly predictive in relation to the
individual user, as well as to the totality of all recorded or known users. This feature will give us very early knowledge of unfolding trends, conditions, evolutions and potential risks, both
individually and systemically. Most importantly, a user may be a person, group of persons (even temporarily constituted), machine, network of machines, and any combination thereof. In other
words, Q-Search incorporates the full effect and advantage that QR provides from an ontological, epistemological, ethical and practical vantage point.
We employ Q-Search technology in the next three QR global applications that we describe in the remaining chapters of our book. Thus in Chapter 6, we propose a fully automated, global,
commercial transaction-space.We have called this space the Global Value Exchange (GVE), because all of its operations and transactions are based on actual products and services, exchanged at
their real value on all the levels of commercial participation. The GVE system will be the first enabling technology that potentially unites all producers and consumers of any product and
service, anywhere in the world, in one single, standardized, transaction space.
The main goals of the GVE are: 1) to reintroduce, in the emergent global economy, the fair exchange of actual goods and services of real value; 2) to create stability through the precise
calibration of economic units and to remove different currencies or instruments that have different values in different places; 3) to remove the highly speculative edge and unnecessary
intermediaries that charge exorbitant interest, leverage between creditors and debtors, and are generally oriented toward usurious practices. In this sense, the GVE automatically adopts and
applies some of the basic principles of traditional commerce, based on fair and mutually advantageous trading and honestly earned profit.
In addition, GVE reduces economic inefficiency to a minimum and, therefore, produces the fairest value, taking into account all of the elements that unite a product or service offering with
its consumer. Most importantly, for the first time in human history, the fundamental ethical principles belonging to the second-order ethics, which are the most appropriate within a planetary
reference frame, will be inbuilt as automatic features of the global economic system. This system will be based on a truly free market, without governmental or any other outside intervention,
and will be impervious to fraud, corruption, and abusive manipulation. It is self-organizing, self-governing and self-policing for the equilibrated benefit of all.
Thus, the GVE system can be seen as a result of a long evolutionary process and constitutes a new stage in human development, viewed within a global reference frame. Within the GVE system,
the creation of products and services will become a co-evolutionary process, governed by natural feedback loops between producers and consumers. The GVE system will therefore generate a
symbiosis between those who produce actual goods and services and those who ultimately consume them. With the help of this system, not only commercial transactions between producers and
consumers, but also all other human interactions will be symbiotic and based on mutual benefit, rather than on greed, exploitation, and enslavement. While the GVE system will help prevent
flight of capital, tax evasion, market protectionism, and abusive economic and financial practices in general, it will also help eliminate social conflict, including labor union and management
disputes. It will naturally promote lucrative and wise investments of local and global capital, based on Real Value of goods and services, as well as social responsibility and solidarity
throughout the world.
In turn, in Chapter 7, we describe the rationale and architecture of a fully automated and interactive center of medical diagnostic and genetic data on-line, which can be implemented at the
planetary level. The center uses real-time, health-record data, together with environmental and social data, as data stream, to continuously seed and energize its computational environment. Its
technological medical platform, which we have called Zoe, will gather, process, and redistribute, under fully securitized conditions to protect individual privacy, medical knowledge produced
through the treatment of millions of patients and genetic information generated by thousands of research institutes and laboratories throughout the world.Much has been done in the past few
years in many disconnected projects all over the world in terms of capturing electronic healthrecords. But, Zoe integrates all of these technological advances in a globally arranged base, or
prerequisite electronic environment, and builds up fromthere.
The full implementation of the project requires the sustained, long-term effort of intercultural teams of researchers in fields such as medicine and pharmacology, genetics, bioinformatics,
data management systems, social science, ethics, statistics, health care, intercultural studies, environmental sciences, and so forth, to assist in collecting, evaluating, and organizing
medical and genetic data from doctor’s offices, hospitals, genetic research institutes and laboratories, medical libraries, national health-record offices, and so on. Once the system is fully
implemented, it will greatly advance medical and genetic research, and it will also detect and address outbreaks of epidemics and/or bioterrorist attacks at their incipient stages.
In consonancewith the Quantum Relations Principle, Zoe’s data and methods of collection and analysis are based not only on the assumptions and practices of Western, allopathic medicine, but
also on those of the major schools of so-called alternative medicine. Above all, Zoe is oriented toward preventive instead of “repair” medicine and places healthcare decisions in the hands of
the individual patients, offering them the most effective, comprehensive, and integrated treatments.
Finally, in Chapter 8, we propose the implementation of a planetary network of Intercultural Centers of Integrative Knowledge, Technology and Human Development (ICIKs, for short). These
centers are designed according to the Quantum Relations Principle and are fully capable of developing and operating the kind of global projects that we have described in this book. The overall
mission of the ICIK network is to help re-orient the planet toward a peaceful human mentality and, consequently, toward healthy and prosperous, consensusbased communities, through introducing
innovative and effective learning objectives and strategies that will allow them to meet the challenges and take full advantage of the opportunities of globalization.
In line with its mission, the ICIK network will: 1) train ethically and socially responsible political, business, cultural, and civic leaders and entrepreneurs for a global age; 2) promote
intercultural research, learning, and dialogue in a local, regional and global context; 3) explore, propose and implement ways of devel- oping new transdisciplinary and transcultural knowledge
by integrating the latest research in scientific, humanistic and artistic fields and reorienting such knowledge toward hands-on social and economic problem-solving and creative innovation in
the major domains of human activity ; and 4) help enhance the contributions of each ICIK’s regional communities to the global market by identifying the best ways of translating newly generated
knowledge into economic, societal and cultural value. To fulfill its mission, the ICIK network has five categories of activities: intercultural research, education, consultancy, training and
exchange.
The ICIK network has two main components: the Global Learning and Research Centers (GLRCs) and the Integrated Data Center (IDCs). These two components are closely linked and continuously
coordinate their activities in a mutually reinforcing, symbiotic manner. Each ICIK will choose its own administrative chart and its own research, learning, training and other activities,
according to the specific nature and character of the region inwhich it is located. Nevertheless, its activities must be in keeping with the general mission and objectives of the network and
will be closely coordinated with the similar activities of the other ICIK members, in order to avoid duplication and ensure maximum effectiveness.
Once the initial, basic grid is built, other ICIKs or similar centers will emerge as nodes in a worldwide, self-organizing network that will cover the entire planet. It is absolutely
essential that these centers should be politically and financially independent: they must not be run by any single government or multinational corporation, although they will cooperate with all
public and private organizations, regardless of their ideological or political platforms, as long as such platforms will not be incompatible with the expressed mission and objectives of the
ICIK network.
We should emphasize that all of the QR-based technology that we have described here is available and fully implementable today. Indeed, we are already using it actively in many complex
applications in fields such as big-data news analysis, geopolitical and macroeconomic models, forensics, and dynamic investigations of holistic transdisciplinary relationships in “in–motion
models.” Naturally, we prefer to use supercomputers, super-cloud environments and massive parallel databases in order to unlock the power of the Quantum Relations Principle. But we can add
substantial benefit by just using a pencil and paper to chart out a certain problem in QR terms. As Part Two of the present book will show, we begin by “writing down” the problem in QR
conceptual language and diagrams, before we actually feed it into a supercomputer.We can thus gain superior knowledge and insight about a complex problem even before resorting to a machine to
obtain a definitive solution. In our daily interactions with clients from all over the world we demonstrate how consulting work can be successfully structured around the QR methodologies.
We must also emphasize, however, that our methodologies cannot be fully implemented on a massive, global scale without the intelligent, collective effort on the part of the networked global
community and a great deal of vision and political will on the part of local, regional and world leaders. It is chiefly for this reason that we propose the implementation of the planetary
network of Intercultural Centers of Integrative Knowledge, Technology and Human Development. Indeed, it is our dream and most fervent hope that the 21st century will be known to future
generations as the Age of Global Learning, when humanity has finally renounced violent competition, greed, enslavement, and war and has taken the first, but decisive steps, toward planetary
wisdom.
